Galileo is among the thinkers who explored the relationship between scientific and religious propositions. He believed that the religious statements found in the Scriptures hold significant value, as they guide humanity toward eternal happiness. However, he regarded scientific propositions as neither harmful to human happiness nor central to it, considering them secondary and peripheral. In cases of conflict with new scientific discoveries, he argued that such religious statements should be interpreted metaphorically, rather than taken literally. The most significant critique of Galileo’s view is twofold. First, if these statements are not directly related to human happiness, why are they included in sacred texts? Second, why do the authors of sacred texts present scientific propositions in ways that appear incompatible with modern science? Does this not suggest a lack of scientific understanding on their part? It is important to note that Galileo was a Christian, and his perspective on this matter specifically pertained to the sacred texts of his own religion.